History doesn't move in straight lines — it moves through competing interests, constrained choices, and consequences nobody fully anticipated. I came to that understanding through a combination of sociological study, years in the classroom, and an embarrassing amount of time playing simulation games.

What I've found, teaching high school and middle school social studies in Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey, is that students grasp historical patterns most deeply when they're inside them—when they have to make the decisions, negotiate the constraints, and live with the outcomes. Direct instruction works, but not memorably, and rarely on its own. My approach combines the two.

Retention requires practice, and social studies has a practice problem. Math has drill sets. Language arts has writing exercises. History has discussion, which is valuable, but doesn't guarantee that anything sticks. Simulations fill that gap. They are practice for historical thinking; structured repetition of the patterns that direct instruction introduces.

Historical simulations create concrete experiences for students to draw from, all while enabling their creativity, critical thinking, and desire for social play.

Terepka Teaching exists to put those experiences in more classrooms.

Why Simulations?

Portrait headshot of Nicholas Terepka.

Nicholas M. Terepka, M.S.Ed.

Secondary Social Studies Instructor

Questions?

Comments?

Requests?